Code Inspection: Empty 'for' loop is redundant
If a for loop contains no instructions, and its initialization, condition, and iteration do not use variables from the outer scope, ReSharper suggests removing this loop, for example:
public void MyMethod()
{
for (int i=0; i < 100; i++)
{ }
} Note, however, that a for loop with an empty body could be actually used to iterate though external variables, in which case ReSharper will not highlight it as redundant, for example:
public void MyMethod()
{
int a;
var b = 0;
for (a=0; a < 100; b += a++)
{ }
Console.WriteLine("b = " + b);
}Last modified: 21 December 2018