Inspectopedia Help

Use of transaction management statements in triggers

Reports usages of transaction management statements like COMMIT or ROLLBACK in trigger bodies.

With COMMIT or ROLLBACK statements in a trigger body, the trigger will not compile. The fail happens because triggers start during transactions. When the trigger starts the current transaction is still not complete. As COMMIT terminates a transaction, both statements (COMMIT and ROLLBACK) would lead to an exception. Changes that are executed in a trigger should be committed (or rolled back) by the owning transaction that started the trigger.

Example (Oracle):

CREATE TABLE employee_audit ( id INT NOT NULL, update_date DATE NOT NULL, old_name VARCHAR2(100), new_name VARCHAR2(100) ); CREATE TABLE employees ( id INT NOT NULL, name VARCHAR2(100) NOT NULL ); CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER trig_commit AFTER UPDATE OF name ON employees FOR EACH ROW BEGIN INSERT INTO employee_audit VALUES (:old.id, SYSDATE, :old.name, :new.name); COMMIT; END; CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER trig_rollback AFTER UPDATE OF name ON employees FOR EACH ROW BEGIN INSERT INTO employee_audit VALUES (:old.id, SYSDATE, :old.name, :new.name); ROLLBACK; END;

Inspection Details

Available in:

AppCode 2023.3, CLion 2023.3, DataGrip 2023.3, DataSpell 2023.3, GoLand 2023.3, IntelliJ IDEA 2023.3, JetBrains Rider 2023.1, PhpStorm 2023.3, PyCharm 2023.3, Qodana for .NET 2023.1, Qodana for JVM 2023.3, Qodana for PHP 2023.3, Qodana for Ruby 2023.3, RubyMine 2023.3

Plugin:

Database Tools and SQL, 233.SNAPSHOT

Last modified: 13 July 2023